Elite: Dangerous PvE - Mobius

http://youtube.com/v/ZC_hHxIt-Ig

I would love to read everyone's personal subjective reviews of the Elite: Dangerous release.

Fly safe Commanders.

Sorry Globus, I know it's so obvious (and predictable) but...

http://youtube.com/v/bjPqsDU0j2I

Avago-Earo wrote:Sorry Globus, I know it's so obvious (and predictable) but.....

A lot of ELO fits perfectly with this game.

This is a review. No idea what reviews are taken seriously as I'm new to PC gaming.

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/elite-dangerous

Yeah. You know I like a lot of Punk stuff (for want of a better description ), but I must say 'Mr Blue Sky' is just one of those classics that can't be ignored. Gets me going every time

Avago-Earo wrote:Yeah. You know I like a lot of Punk stuff (for want of a better description ), but I must say 'Mr Blue Sky' is just one of those classics that can't be ignored. Gets me going every time

Yeah. Can't beat a good beat.

I'm gonna put another tune up on a relevant thread.

As was said on FD's forums;
Metacritic only has player reviews at the moment
The release candidate has been out for 2 hours and 10 minutes
Anyone who writes a review within that length of time should be shot for stupidity tbh.

Gamma players have their own opinions but should at least wait a few days as we know what changes have happened in the last 24 hours alone

MarrV wrote:As was said on FD's forums;
Metacritic only has player reviews at the moment
The release candidate has been out for 2 hours and 10 minutes
Anyone who writes a review within that length of time should be shot for stupidity tbh.

Gamma players have their own opinions but should at least wait a few days as we know what changes have happened in the last 24 hours alone

Thanks for the information. New to all this stuff. It's good to know. One thing I have got the impression of though is that some reviews can't be trusted. There is always 'fan wars' (sorry just made that up, you know what I mean), but on top of that I read about software companies giving incentives for reviewers to give a good rating, including those on You Tube.

I've read a few of those and they seem to be heavily biased either way.